Considering user request

The user wrote a Chinese sentence that looks like a headline about CIES and Manchester United's performance in signings over the last five years. They might want a summary or further details. It seems like a straightforward statement, but I could ask a clarifying question. I might provide a concise explanation of CIES, the implications of that report, and context regarding metrics like "transfer fee invested vs. minutes played and performance." I just need to ensure I avoid any misinformation.Analyzing transfer efficiency
I need to be careful about sharing specifics related to events after my knowledge cutoff in October 2024. Since today is December 27, 2025, there may be newer developments. I should let the user know about my limitations and ask if they want me to look for more recent information. Although they didn't pose a specific question, they might be looking for analysis on Manchester United's transfer inefficiencies versus Real Madrid's strengths. I could offer a brief analysis and suggest bullet points about metrics like the "transfer success rate index" and CIES Football Observatory's "transfer value ROI."Responding to user inquiry
I need to handle specific numbers carefully, so I can respond by explaining that CIES analyzed the last five seasons from 2019 to 2024. The ROI measures sporting contribution against transfer spending and salaries, identifying Manchester United as last among the big five clubs, while Real Madrid ranks best and PSG fifth.

Some reasons could include United's high fees for players who haven’t fit well, managerial changes, and injuries. Meanwhile, Real Madrid focuses on young talents that provide high contributions and resale value. I’ll ask what the user would like, perhaps a source link, a full ranking, or a graphic. Keeping it concise is key!
这是在说 CIES 足球天文台的一份“引援性价比/投入产出”评估:过去5年里,曼联把钱花得最不值,皇马最优,巴黎第五。通常这类榜单会用转会费+薪资投入,对比新援在联赛中的出场时间、表现/影响力以及年龄与贬值风险来算“ROI”。
几点背景与原因(概括):
需要我: